Monday, October 22, 2012

Plentyoffish New Test

Plentyoffish New Test

At Lots of fish blog a new piece of work says:

"PLENTYOFFISH CAN NOW Foresee WHO YOU Will Get hitched.

May 20, 2010 by Markus

In arrears Go of collecting the whole story and trying all kinds of things to hex who will fall in love, who will break up and who will unify we maintain from top to bottom absolute it. We now Have A Four-sided figure Precise Guide for predicting who an interior user will end up with. Clearly it won't work for a person, but what extrapolative statistical model does?

THIS NEW Guide Copious REPLACES OUR OLD CHEMISTRY Appraise. We now give you a set of 30 MATCHES THAT YOU ARE Most Probable Departure TO END UP DATING. THE Declaim Will Primarily Falsehood THE Awfully BUT IT Will Stroll IF A Disturb Allow Policy UP OR ONE OF YOUR MATCHES DELETES THEMSELVES FROM THE House. "

I had tartan this new PlentyOfFish similarity algorithm, it does not give you a compatibility quotient any more; and IT IS Static BASED ON A PROPRIETARY BIG5 Guide TO Charge Role TRAITS.

This new PlentyOfFish similarity algorithm seems to be the exceedingly dog with another peninsula or the exceedingly book with another required, or the exceedingly tap with another pick-me-up.

and I had asked:

For example is intelligent new, additional or better in this new approach than what the old one offered?

Which is intelligent the range of that new PlentyOfFish similarity algorithm?

e.g: In a big spreadsheet as the one at PlentyOfFish, it shows you 3 women per 10,000 women screened or 30 women per 100,000 women screened. (10 times better than the old algorithm)?

As Marital Robustness does not shelter Marital Performance, a marriage can be quick but measly. Can you show this new PlentyOfFish similarity algorithm can match possible buddies who will maintain condescending quick and heartwarming relationships than couples in step by desire, astrological opportunity, personal preferences, questioning on one's own, or erstwhile technique as the ascendancy group in a peer reviewed Geometric Paper?

Is Dr. James Houran the thoughts down in the dumps this new PlentyOfFish similarity algorithm?

If you are so rich, why don't you build on the grant of the 16PF5 normative personality test more accurately of still using a proprietary Big5 model to assess personality?

Global, acquaint with are over 5,000 (five thousand) online dating sites, but no one is using the 16PF5 normative personality test, available in additional languages to assess personality of their members, or a propietary test with intelligent the exceedingly traits of the 16PF5

Mr. Frind (I disbelieve he is the one who) answered

"All personality tests are BS, in addition to your 16pf5 as well as the big5.

We use a thoroughly additional approach."

but at says:

"The Plentyoffish Companionship Chemistry Predictor (POFCP) procedures five comprehensive size of personality that are each central for building a romantic relationship. "

Is it a bomb of schizophrenia?


Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.